FlashComGuru Home Influxis ImediaseeUvault
                                                                                       Forum Index | Active Topics | Register
                                                                                                          List Overview | List Archives
                                                                                                                           About this site | Advertise
 

home

Adobe AIR (11)
Applications (41)
Books & Training (11)
Collaboration (18)
Components (11)
Events (87)
Flash Player (47)
Flex (41)
FMS (114)
General (128)
Hosting (6)
Jobs (17)
Off topic (43)
OSMF (5)
Press Releases (24)
Site Check (11)
Tools (56)
Videos & Players (74)

Follow me on Twitter

 
'I get no spam' - a quote by John C. Dvorak. He is referring to an email filtering system which offers a highly effective approach to spam detection, offered by Computer Tyme, a small service provider with a website at junkemailfilter.com.

As you can imagine I get many many emails since I not only run this blog but several other sites and domains. A couple of years ago the amount of spam I was receiving got severely out of hand. I was finding myself spending incrasing amounts of time on wading through spam and I was losing time and money. Something had to be done. After trying a lot of approaches including server side blacklists via SpamAssassin as well as client side filtering I gave junkemailfilter.com a try. I haven't looked back since.

What I like about the service is the fact that spam never even touches my mail server, instead it is filtered beforehand. That means I no longer have to download tons of spam emails which get sorted into a junk email folder, which I in turn have to wade through anyway to check for false positives. Junkemailfilter.com acts as a kind of proxy mail server to any domains I add to it, meaning that mail for my sites is delivered to their mail servers where it is filtered and only the good mail is forwarded to me. To make it effective they deploy every anti spam trick in the book, starting with intentionally invalid MX records (spammers often only try the first MX record, then give up if that fails) to 'normal' filters such as SpamAssassin. In fact most spam is rejected right at connect time to the mail server, and overall Junkemailfilter.com has over 99% accuracy.

You can read more about how it works here.

So if you have a problem with spam then drop Marc Perkel at Computer Tyme a note. If you do, or if you are already using his service, then please leave a comment and tell us about your experiences. I'm glad to say that I am in the same camp as John C. Dvorak: I get no spam.

Comments
[Add Comment]
I just use gmail as my mail client. Seems to filter out spam pretty well. Spam never makes it to my desktop client or iphone unless I specifically chose to download it. I also use gmail to handle my domain accounts.. I really don't like spam blockers that completely block all spam, putting it into its own folder and keeping it on the server is best because no matter how good the spam filter there will invariably be false positives that get marked spam. If it never shows you this message at all you're completely in the dark and will never recieve it. If its in spam, you can keep it, then reference back to that spam list when someone asks if you recieved their email.
# Posted By Dustin Sparks | 12/30/08 3:25 AM
Point taken, however you still end up wading through a folder full of junk which takes a long time, at least if you get as much mail as I used to. I have had 2 false positives that I know of in over 1 year and from experience (I use Gmail too on occasions) I know that you miss more legitimate emails while wading through your spam folder as I get false positives (and they are close ot 0 - people still get in touch with me somehow and report a bounce, but as I said it happened twice in a year). Difference is with this service you don't have to spend any time on it, which was my goal. False positives cannot be totally avoided with any filter, but I am happy with the ratio and its the best I have found anywhere including Gmail. Any manual checking of spam for false positives is not a good solution since it defeats the objective.
# Posted By Stefan Richter | 12/30/08 1:17 PM
I remember the days you could phone the sender of a spam email and $&#* him about his action ... how silly ... it seems today.
I've used several commercial services, but none satisfied me. Personally I use Gmail as a filter and that works fine for 97%. For our businesses I still don't have the answer, so I am really interested in the services of junkemailfilter.com. The only hesitationas an european; it's an american service, like Google.
What if...
# Posted By Tino Klumpen | 12/31/08 12:44 AM
The comment regarding spam blockers discarding false positives is a bit off. If a mail server is properly configured to not accept spam then the mail should be rejected rather than shot off to /dev/null. In the event of most spam this may result in it being lost in the ether, but in the event of a false positive (again assuming proper configuration) the sender will receive a bounce message which can then be resolved and the message properly resent.
# Posted By Matthew Whipple | 1/25/09 12:44 AM