Adobe have just released version 2.5 of the Flash Media Encoder, a free live video encoder which connects to Flash Media Server 3 or a compatible CDN to broadcast live Flash video streams in high quality.
Apart from H.264 support the software also supports the commercial AAC Audio Encoder Plug-in by MainConcept, rounding off the capability to deliver high quality live webcasts in Flash.
Apart from H.264 support the software also supports the commercial AAC Audio Encoder Plug-in by MainConcept, rounding off the capability to deliver high quality live webcasts in Flash.
More details are available on the product page. I'm hoping to set up a sample stream sometime soon - I just need to wrap up half a dozen or so projects first ;-)

Well, I have, and I must say the quality is quite awful.
Same goes for the Quicktime Broadcaster, I wonder why these tools produce such crappy videos.
My benchmark is - unforunately - Windows Media Encoder, which produces so much better video.
I would love to hear feedback from other users, as I would love to use live encoding with h.264....
On my machine, framerate on PAL size encoding goes down to 12fps... same thing as wmv9 takes about 30% processor load.
I will investigate further with lower resolutions.
Would love to hear other user's experiences...
I think I just found out a major drawback (at least for me) while testing the new FME with h.264.
It seems that it is NOT POSSIBLE to record H.264 streams on FMS 3. Looks like you only can record on the server when you stream with flv. What stupid thing is this? I still hope I am wrong, has anyone found out about this?
do you have any idea in what timeframe this might happen?
Version 3.02, or more FMS 4.0....
Maybe it's a bug with .124?
I think I'll watch this for a while :-)
Let's take this to email for now. Can you email me please?
stefan at flashcomguru dot com
while testing different encoding bitrates for live h.264 video, we encountered a strange problem:
Quality of h.264 video doesn't seem to change, even if we alter the bitrate quite dramastic.
Eg. 640x480 video looks quite the same, whether encoded with 350kbit or with 1000 kbit.
That can't be right, especially because the quality is always not great.
Any thoughts? Anybody can confirm this?
thanks
thomas
We did really extensive testing, and always have these strange results. For example, when the camera moves from one side to the other, it's never a smooth movement, even though the encoder says it does 25fps....
Same with picture quality: for a 720 size format, it doesn't matter if we encode with 600kbit or 1500kbit, quality stays mostly the same. Filesize of course increases accordingly, but not quality. Are there some hidden settings we can try (such as, how many I-frames etc.?)
Regards
thomas