FlashComGuru Home InfluxisCDNImediaseeUvault
                                                                                       Forum Index | Active Topics | Register
                                                                                                          List Overview | List Archives
                                                                                                                           About this site | Advertise
 

home

Adobe AIR (11)
Applications (40)
Books & Training (11)
Collaboration (18)
Components (10)
Events (80)
Flash Player (35)
Flex (39)
FMS (110)
General (123)
Hosting (6)
Jobs (17)
Off topic (36)
OSMF (3)
Press Releases (23)
Site Check (11)
Tools (53)
Videos & Players (74)

Follow me on Twitter

 
The Collaborative Methods blog has seen an update in which Varun Parmar, the AFCS Product Manager, is asking for feedback on the proposed pricing models for AFCS (aka Cocomo). For those not in the know, AFCS stands for Adobe Flash Collaboration Service, a hosted service that provides real-time capabilities to Flex and AIR based applications. It runs on the Adobe Connect backend and provides a similar feature set to Adobe's own product (similar, yes, not identical but let's not go into that now ;-)

The proposed pricing models are, as you can imagine, fairly complex since they aim to support a variety of different usage models as well as data intensive or messaging intensive applications. The proposed models will include par per use pricing as well as a zero upfront costs, both of which are plus points in my book. What remains to be seen is how the running costs of AFCS compare to something like FMS, especially for smaller apps that do not require the infinite scalability of a cloud based service.

I cannot remember a time in which Adobe would ask its customers for feedback on proposed pricing *before* the product was fully released and I would therefore urge everyone to voice their opinions on the proposed pricing models now. Note that actual figures on price points have not yet been made public, but as Varun outlines this will happen in the not too distant future.

Comments
[Add Comment]
I think this "asking for feedback" has its roots back in the pricing debate after the FMS 2.0 launch.

Also I think they should go for a pricing model similar to the one behind Amazon S3 and Ec2 ?!
# Posted By Ncu | 3/31/09 7:35 PM
@Ncu - Re: FMS 2.0 Nah, not really - we're doing things differently than usual, because we know that what we're offering (a utility service) is pretty different from what the company currently offers, and want to make sure we get it right (or at least close!).
Thanks for the feedback around S3/EC2. This is definitely one of the possibilities - see the survey posted in that blog : http://bit.ly/FCIXQ, and let us know!
# Posted By Nigel Pegg | 4/2/09 12:45 AM